Upgrades to Exposure
Our trip to Robodojo earlier this month highlighted a few issues that needed to be resolved. Most of these problems were to do with the weapon assembly, which had way too much flex and caused us to lose the weapon in our first fight. Also, the 3D printed parts were PLA at the event (uh oh) so they needed to be re-printed in TPU with a slight redesign for some parts. The fork mounts needed a way to stop the forks rotating under the robot like they did in York, and the weapon spacing needed to be increased. After looking at different companies that could print what we needed, we decided that it would be easier (and probably more cost efficient) if we bought our own 3D printer and TPU filament. This also opens up a lot of opportunities for printed antweight and beetleweight chassises.
The first step for improving the weapon was to move the weapon bulkheads outwards and extend them backwards to the piece that separates the drive motors from the rest of the robot. We changed the mounting position of the weapon motor to be behind the weapon and inside of the bulkheads. This helped with internal space and also meant that the motor and pulley had no chance of being hit again. The battery has swapped sides and has moved up along the outside edge of the left weapon bulkhead near the link. The weapon ESC and receiver are on the right side, with the breakout cable in the centre so that all of the components make a sort of 'U' shape around the weaponWe then printed a slighter bigger pulley and bolted it through the weapon into a piece holding two M4 nuts and pressed a 6 x 19 x 6mm bearing into each side. The increased distance between the bearings helps eliminate the flex that the weapon had in the earlier version. We have both weapons assembled like this so there is no need to take the entire weapon assembly apart for every swap. Just take the shoulder bolt out, and slide the new weapon on. Speaking of shoulder bolts, longer ones were ordered to fit the new assembly, we made a new belt to cover the extra distance.
Comments
Post a Comment